Tucker Adelman
 
logo-dist.png
 

LA County Fair

Modal Form Flow For Vendors

 
LACF Final Mockup.png
 
 
LACFsunset.jpg
 

Scope

  • Time: 2 weeks

  • Tools: Sketch, Lucidchart, InVision Studio, Pen & Paper

  • Responsibilities: Research, Data Synthesis, Sketching, Information Architecture, Usability Testing, Prototyping

The purpose of the study was to first evaluate the fair’s vendor enrollment pathway, then implement a redesign based on my findings. This was not a full site redesign. It was strictly to improve upon the way vendors found and completed the vendor application.

This was a concept project and not sanctioned by the LA County Fair or any of its affiliates.

 

 

What is it?

logo-dist.png

The LA County Fair is the fourth largest county fair in the country, with over 1.3 million visitors each year. It hosts a wide variety of food and commercial vendors each season with a host of diverse products and needs.

The theme this year is Route 66 and the open road.

 

Research

Background Cobalt.png
 

Interviews

Through Interviews I found vendors preferred online forms and were more likely to return to the fair if they felt it was a warm and welcoming environment.

 

Likes:

  • Saved information from previous year if returning vendor

  • 30 minutes max to complete

  • Forms contained on one page

Dislikes:

  • Long forms

  • Entering the same information multiple times

  • Incorrect estimation of time to complete task

 

 

User Observation

 

Users between 26 & 56 years of age were told to navigate from the home page through the vendor form. This created a gauge of how the task would appear to new applicants.

Combined with a heuristic analysis the two main problems revealed themselves to be application itself, but also the pathway to the application.

 

 

 Problem Areas

 
 
 
Quote2.png
OG ven page.png
  1. Hierarchy of information reduces clarity.

  2. The different forms are unorganized, path to online application is hidden within .pdf forms.

 
 
 
Quote3.png
OG Ven Form.png
  1. Not a different application. This link just reloads the same form.

  2. This is just a drop down menu. Users have to backtrack to reference map info.

  3. Must make 8 entries, even if only selling one item. No option to add more than 8 if necessary.

 
IMG_5917.jpeg

Card Sorting

Open card sorting helped to evaluate the primary and secondary navigation of the home page to see how it could be organized better, with users’ expectations and existing mental models as a base.

Background Cobalt.png
 
The user’s journey as it stands now.

The user’s journey as it stands now.

Synthesis

Background Cobalt.png
 

 User Persona

 
Mick Persona.png
 
 

Mick was conceived to set the baseline expectation of use. If Mick can get through the online process easily, then it will presumably be much easier to involve someone who is more tech-savvy.

 
 

Goal:

Help Mick submit his application comfortably online, while still keeping it in a format that is easy to understand.

If it’s easy for Mick - it’s easy for everybody!

Problem: 

When signing up to become a vendor on the original site it was easy to get bogged down and discouraged by all the information and unclear pathways.

 
 
Background Cobalt.png
 

Information Architecture

 

Original site map:

 

The original site offered access to too much information too quickly, evidenced by the breadth of the above sitemap. Feel free to take a closer look.

 
 

 

Sitemap 2.0

 
 

After using the information gathered from card sorting I developed a new map, show below. The new map runs deeper but distributes information in a more palatable manner.

 
LACF REVISED SITEMAP (1).png
 

Design 

Background Cobalt.png
 

Sketches

 

 

Usability Testing

First I tested for discoverability and accessibility. Because of time constraints I used sketches to iterate and test ideas quickly, refining as I went along.

ezgif.com-resize.gif
 

 

Mid-Fidelity Wireframes

 
 
 

High-Fidelity Wireframes

 
 
 

Clickable Prototype